Safety of primary immunization using inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac®) among population aged 3 years and older in a large-scale use: A multi-center open-label study in China.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of primary immunization using CoronaVac® among population aged 3 years and above in a large-scale use. METHOD: A multi-center open-label study was carried out in 11 provinces of China. Individuals aged 3 years and older who had no history of COVID-19 vaccination or had received only one dose of CoronaVac® were enrolled in this study. Adults and elderly with or without underlying medical conditions(UMCs) were also recruited. Eligible participants received one or two doses of CoronaVac® with an interval of 28 days. Demographic information, vaccination and the occurrence of adverse events were recorded by participants or guardians using data collection system designed for this study. All adverse events occurred within 6 months after the second dose of vaccination were collected. The incidence of adverse events that cannot be ruled out as being caused by the vaccine were calculated to assess the safety of CoronaVac®. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials. Gov (NCT04911790 and NCT04992208). RESULTS: A total of 162,691 participants have been included in this study and 89.50 % had finished primary immunization. Among adults and elderly, people with UMCs accounted for 25.85 %, with the top five disease being hypertension, diabetes, chronic gastritis, coronary heart disease(CHD) and kidney stone. The overall incidence of adverse reactions (ARs) within 6 months after the second vaccination was 2.70 %, with incidence for children and adolescents, adults, and elderly being 2.03 %, 3.46 %, and 1.90 %, respectively. Most ARs were mild (grade 1). Pain at the injection sites, fatigue, induration/swelling, and headache were the most common symptoms, occurring in 1.64 %, 0.46 %, 0.31 % and 0.24 %, respectively. No serious adverse events related to vaccines were reported. No adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were identified. For children and adolescents, children aged 3-5 years had the highest incidence of ARs of 3.29 %. The incidence of ARs among those aged 18 years and older with and without UMCs were 2.81 % and 2.99 %, respectively, with no statistical significance between two groups(P = 0.089). And people with coronary heart disease had higher AR incidence compared to those with other UMCs, but the most common symptoms was pain at the injection site. CONCLUSION: CoronaVac® is safe in a large-scale use and shows well-tolerance for children and adolescents and people with underlying medical conditions. Further studies need to be conducted to explore the relation of ARs incidence to age or different kinds of UMCs.

An evaluation index system for regional mobile SARS-CoV-2 virus nucleic acid testing capacity in China: a modified Delphi consensus study.

BACKGROUND: Large-scale detection has great potential to bring benefits for containing the COVID-19 epidemic and supporting the government in reopening economic activities. Evaluating the true regional mobile severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus nucleic acid testing capacity is essential to improve the overall fighting performance against this epidemic and maintain economic development. However, such a tool is not available in this issue. We aimed to establish an evaluation index system for assessing the regional mobile SARS-CoV-2 virus nucleic acid testing capacity and provide suggestions for improving the capacity level. METHODS: The initial version of the evaluation index system was identified based on massive literature and expert interviews. The Delphi method questionnaire was designed and 30 experts were consulted in two rounds of questionnaire to select and revise indexes at all three levels. The Analytic Hierarchy Process method was used to calculate the weight of indexes at all three levels. RESULTS: The evaluation index system for assessing the regional mobile SARS-CoV-2 virus nucleic acid testing capacity, including 5 first-level indexes, 17 second-level indexes, and 90 third-level indexes. The response rates of questionnaires delivered in the two rounds of consultation were 100 and 96.7%. Furthermore, the authority coefficient of 30 experts was 0.71. Kendall's coordination coefficient differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). The weighted values of capacity indexes were established at all levels according to the consistency test, demonstrating that 'Personnel team construction' (0.2046) came first amongst the five first-level indexes, followed by 'Laboratory performance building and maintenance' (0.2023), 'Emergency response guarantee' (0.1989), 'Information management system for nucleic acid testing resources' (0.1982) and 'Regional mobile nucleic acid testing emergency response system construction' (0.1959). CONCLUSION: The evaluation system for assessing the regional mobile SARS-CoV-2 virus nucleic acid testing capacity puts forward a specific, objective, and quantifiable evaluation criterion. The evaluation system can act as a tool for diversified subjects to find the weak links and loopholes. It also provides a measurable basis for authorities to improve nucleic acid testing capabilities.

Safety, immunogenicity, and immune persistence of two inactivated COVID-19 vaccines replacement vaccination in China: An observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To mitigate a national shortage of WIBP-CorV COVID-19 vaccine, China's regulator approved administering BBIBP-CorV after WIBP-CorV for completion of a primary series. In a pragmatic observational study, we compared immunogenicity and safety of a primary series of WIBP-CorV followed by BBIBP-CorV with a primary series of two doses of BBIBP-CorV. METHODS: We invited healthy 18-59-years-old adults who had already received either WIBP-CorV or BBIBP-CorV as their first dose in a primary series to participate in this observational cohort study. Subjects who had received WIBP-CorV as their first dose became the observation group; subjects who had received BBIBP-CorV as their first dose became the control group. All participants received BBIBP-CorV as their second dose. We obtained sera 1, 2, and 6 months after second doses for nAb titer measurement by micro-neutralization cytopathic effect assay with SARS-CoV-2 strain HB01, standardized with WHO International Standard for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin. Safety was assessed for the 7 days after administration of second doses. RESULTS: Between March and December 2021, 275 subjects were included in the observation group and 133 in the control group. Neutralizing seropositivity (≥1:4) rates were 98.91 % and 99.25 % at 1 month and 53.16 % and 70.69 % at 6 months. One-month geometric mean titers (GMTs) were 21.33 and 22.45; one-month geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) were 227.71 IU/mL and 273.27 IU/mL. One to two months after vaccination, observation group seropositivity rates and titers were not significantly different to the control group's. Adverse reaction rates were 11.27 % and 18.80 %, all mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Both primary series were immunogenic; immunogenicity of WIBP-CorV followed by BBIBP-CorV was not different than immunogenicity following two doses of BBIBP-CorV for two months after vaccination; safety profiles were acceptable for both regimens. BBIBP-CorV can be used to complete a primary series that started with WIBP-CorV.

Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: The initial cases of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)-infected pneumonia (NCIP) occurred in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, in December 2019 and January 2020. We analyzed data on the first 425 confirmed cases in Wuhan to determine the epidemiologic characteristics of NCIP. METHODS: We collected information on demographic characteristics, exposure history, and illness timelines of laboratory-confirmed cases of NCIP that had been reported by January 22, 2020. We described characteristics of the cases and estimated the key epidemiologic time-delay distributions. In the early period of exponential growth, we estimated the epidemic doubling time and the basic reproductive number. RESULTS: Among the first 425 patients with confirmed NCIP, the median age was 59 years and 56% were male. The majority of cases (55%) with onset before January 1, 2020, were linked to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, as compared with 8.6% of the subsequent cases. The mean incubation period was 5.2 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1 to 7.0), with the 95th percentile of the distribution at 12.5 days. In its early stages, the epidemic doubled in size every 7.4 days. With a mean serial interval of 7.5 days (95% CI, 5.3 to 19), the basic reproductive number was estimated to be 2.2 (95% CI, 1.4 to 3.9). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this information, there is evidence that human-to-human transmission has occurred among close contacts since the middle of December 2019. Considerable efforts to reduce transmission will be required to control outbreaks if similar dynamics apply elsewhere. Measures to prevent or reduce transmission should be implemented in populations at risk. (Funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China and others.).